[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "incompatible implicit declaration" warnings with GCC 4.2.1
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: "incompatible implicit declaration" warnings with GCC 4.2.1 |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Oct 2007 06:05:53 +0200 |
> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 23:55:29 +0200
> From: "Juanma Barranquero" <address@hidden>
> Cc: "Eli Zaretskii" <address@hidden>, address@hidden
>
> I'd really like to know why this include shuffling is suddenly needed
> with GCC 4.2.1...
Evidently, GCC 4.2.1 now has more functions implemented as built-ins,
among them `pow' and `abort'. This means that GCC knows their
prototypes even without seeing the header file in which they are
supposed to be declared. Thus, it can now issue warnings where it
previously couldn't.
- Re: "incompatible implicit declaration" warnings with GCC 4.2.1, (continued)
- Re: "incompatible implicit declaration" warnings with GCC 4.2.1, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/10/22
- Re: "incompatible implicit declaration" warnings with GCC 4.2.1, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/22
- Re: "incompatible implicit declaration" warnings with GCC 4.2.1, Jason Rumney, 2007/10/22
- Re: "incompatible implicit declaration" warnings with GCC 4.2.1, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/22
- Re: "incompatible implicit declaration" warnings with GCC 4.2.1, Jason Rumney, 2007/10/22
- Re: "incompatible implicit declaration" warnings with GCC 4.2.1, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/22
- Re: "incompatible implicit declaration" warnings with GCC 4.2.1, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/22
- Re: "incompatible implicit declaration" warnings with GCC 4.2.1, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/24
- Re: "incompatible implicit declaration" warnings with GCC 4.2.1, Jason Rumney, 2007/10/24
- Re: "incompatible implicit declaration" warnings with GCC 4.2.1, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/24
- Re: "incompatible implicit declaration" warnings with GCC 4.2.1,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: "incompatible implicit declaration" warnings with GCC 4.2.1, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/23