[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: suppress_checking
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: suppress_checking |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:56:46 +0200 |
On 10/24/07, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:
> So we might as well make CHECK not compute the condition expression
> either. Which means that it might as well test suppress_checking
> first.
It would be useful to know what was the intention with
suppress_checking, and how is used (if someone does use it indeed).
Currently there's a difference between
#undef ENABLE_CHECKING
and
#define ENABLE_CHECKING 1
suppress_checking = 1;
because in the latter case, the check tests are still executed, though
its return value is discarded. Perhaps that difference was intended.
Juanma