[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "incompatible implicit declaration" warnings with GCC 4.2.1
|
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
|
Subject: |
Re: "incompatible implicit declaration" warnings with GCC 4.2.1 |
|
Date: |
Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:53:03 +0200 |
On 10/24/07, Jason Rumney <address@hidden> wrote:
> They are not fixing a bug, only getting rid of compiler warnings, and
> the changes were substantial enough to carry a risk of breaking
> something, so I'd rather not.
That's true for the `abort' warning. The one for `pow' can be cured
just by including <math.h>, I think.
Juanma
- "incompatible implicit declaration" warnings with GCC 4.2.1, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/22
- Re: "incompatible implicit declaration" warnings with GCC 4.2.1, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/10/22
- Re: "incompatible implicit declaration" warnings with GCC 4.2.1, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/22
- Re: "incompatible implicit declaration" warnings with GCC 4.2.1, Jason Rumney, 2007/10/22
- Re: "incompatible implicit declaration" warnings with GCC 4.2.1, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/22
- Re: "incompatible implicit declaration" warnings with GCC 4.2.1, Jason Rumney, 2007/10/22
- Re: "incompatible implicit declaration" warnings with GCC 4.2.1, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/22
- Re: "incompatible implicit declaration" warnings with GCC 4.2.1, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/22
- Re: "incompatible implicit declaration" warnings with GCC 4.2.1, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/24
- Re: "incompatible implicit declaration" warnings with GCC 4.2.1, Jason Rumney, 2007/10/24
- Re: "incompatible implicit declaration" warnings with GCC 4.2.1,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: "incompatible implicit declaration" warnings with GCC 4.2.1, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/10/23
- Re: "incompatible implicit declaration" warnings with GCC 4.2.1, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/23