[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: suppress_checking
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: suppress_checking |
|
Date: |
Tue, 30 Oct 2007 01:24:42 -0400 |
Since CHECK itself just evaluates the test and does nothing with it
if ENABLE_CHECKING is not defined, assuming you have a decent
optimizing compiler,
We're interested in GCC, not particularly in "decent optimizing
compilers". Does GCC in fact optimize these cases?
- suppress_checking, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/22
- Re: suppress_checking, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/23
- Re: suppress_checking, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/23
- Re: suppress_checking, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/23
- Re: suppress_checking, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/24
- Re: suppress_checking, Ken Raeburn, 2007/10/29
- Re: suppress_checking, Ken Raeburn, 2007/10/29
- Re: suppress_checking, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/29
- Re: suppress_checking, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/29
- Re: suppress_checking, Ken Raeburn, 2007/10/29
- Re: suppress_checking,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: suppress_checking, Ken Raeburn, 2007/10/31