[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New keybinding suggestion: C-x _ for `shrink-window'
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: New keybinding suggestion: C-x _ for `shrink-window' |
Date: |
Sun, 04 Nov 2007 14:56:56 -0500 |
> That seems basically good, but using other characters
> such as arrow keys would be an improvement.
> / and \ could be good for vertical size changes
> and [,] for horizontal; they don't need a shift key.
On international keyboards you can be pretty sure that ascii letters
and decimal numerals won't need a shift key (unless the keyboard is in
ISO level 3 shift lock mode, in which case you are restricted to
numerals). On all punctuation, except maybe period and comma, you
can't be sure.
Letters and numbers are not as good for this purpose than graphics
that have a clear symbolic meaning. So we have a trade-off between
clear mnemonic choices and support for non-US keyboards. I'm inclined
to choose the clear mnemonic choices, esp. since most keyboards
have arrow keys too.
- Re: New keybinding suggestion: C-x _ for `shrink-window', (continued)
Re: New keybinding suggestion: C-x _ for `shrink-window', David Kastrup, 2007/11/01
Re: New keybinding suggestion: C-x _ for `shrink-window', Richard Stallman, 2007/11/01
Re: New keybinding suggestion: C-x _ for `shrink-window', Sascha Wilde, 2007/11/02
Re: New keybinding suggestion: C-x _ for `shrink-window', Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/03