[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mark-word
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: mark-word |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Nov 2007 18:18:44 +0900 |
"Lennart Borgman (gmail)" <address@hidden> writes:
>> It could also be implemented rather simply using primitive functions.
>> The thing-at-point code is hairy and ugly, so it seems backwards to base
>> other simpler functions on it...
>
> Using thing-at-point to make mark-thing-at-point (and then
> mark-work-at-point etc) would mean that it is consistent and eaiser for
> the user to remember.
Why? The user doesn't care how mark-word-at-point (incidentally, this
is a crap name) is implemented.
-Miles
--
Love is a snowmobile racing across the tundra. Suddenly it flips over,
pinning you underneath. At night the ice weasels come. --Nietzsche
- mark-word, (continued)
- mark-word, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/14
- Re: mark-word, Leo, 2007/11/14
- Re: mark-word, David Kastrup, 2007/11/14
- Re: mark-word, Andreas Röhler, 2007/11/14
- Re: mark-word, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/14
- Re: mark-word, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/11/14
- Re: mark-word, Miles Bader, 2007/11/14
- Re: mark-word, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/11/15
- Re: mark-word,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: mark-word, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/11/15
- Re: mark-word, Andreas Röhler, 2007/11/15
- Re: mark-word, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/14