Re: "simplifications"

[Juanma Barranquero]

On Nov 19, 2007 4:44 PM, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:

> Well, my optimization is not specific to defsubst, so it will also
> remove the let-binding in:
>
>    (let ((debug-on-error t))
>      (car (car (cdr x))))

Why? There can be no dynamic bindings under that optimization?

> In any case, if you want a "fast and loose" defsubst, it's there already
> under the name defsubst*.

I'll remember it. Thanks again.

             Juanma