[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: byte compiling defcustom
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: byte compiling defcustom |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:03:03 -0500 |
For what it's worth, there's a possible middle ground:
use byte-optimize rather the byte-compile. So the code is still "normal
elisp source code" but potentially a bit different from the original.
I don't see any major flaws with that, but I think it is cleaner
to show the expression precisely as it was in the source code.
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, (continued)
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Luc Teirlinck, 2007/11/17
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Luc Teirlinck, 2007/11/17
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Luc Teirlinck, 2007/11/17
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Luc Teirlinck, 2007/11/17
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Stefan Monnier, 2007/11/17
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Luc Teirlinck, 2007/11/18
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/11/18
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Luc Teirlinck, 2007/11/18
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/11/18
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Stefan Monnier, 2007/11/19
- Re: byte compiling defcustom,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Luc Teirlinck, 2007/11/19
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Richard Stallman, 2007/11/20
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Luc Teirlinck, 2007/11/19
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Richard Stallman, 2007/11/19
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Richard Stallman, 2007/11/19
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/11/19
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Richard Stallman, 2007/11/19
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Richard Stallman, 2007/11/17