[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: byte compiling defcustom
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: byte compiling defcustom |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:03:18 -0500 |
Again, I claim that if the user needs to see lisp for a defcustom, then
the defcustom is not designed well enough and is not very user
friendly.
That may be true to some extent, but I am not sure it is always true.
Anyway these defcustoms shuld work right
even if their definitions are not ideal.
To me it seems that maintaining an infrastructure to access the original
lisp values for defcustom is just added complexity
It is reduced complexity. The code to compile these values would be added
complexity.
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, (continued)
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/11/18
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Luc Teirlinck, 2007/11/18
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/11/18
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Stefan Monnier, 2007/11/19
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Richard Stallman, 2007/11/19
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Luc Teirlinck, 2007/11/19
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Richard Stallman, 2007/11/20
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Luc Teirlinck, 2007/11/19
- Re: byte compiling defcustom,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Richard Stallman, 2007/11/19
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/11/19
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Richard Stallman, 2007/11/19
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Richard Stallman, 2007/11/17