[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: byte compiling defcustom
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: byte compiling defcustom |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:59:17 -0500 |
Good example, it addresses the points I was trying to make:
1. Is there any value in this being a defcustom? IMO, absolutely not.
I don't know, but it doesn't affect this issue. It IS a defcustom,
and as long as it is a defcustom, it needs to work right.
Since there is no important need for this optimization, my
decision is not to add it.
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, (continued)
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Luc Teirlinck, 2007/11/18
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/11/18
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Stefan Monnier, 2007/11/19
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Richard Stallman, 2007/11/19
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Luc Teirlinck, 2007/11/19
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Richard Stallman, 2007/11/20
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Luc Teirlinck, 2007/11/19
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Richard Stallman, 2007/11/19
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Richard Stallman, 2007/11/19
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/11/19
- Re: byte compiling defcustom,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Richard Stallman, 2007/11/17