[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: invisible
From: |
Stephen Berman |
Subject: |
Re: invisible |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Nov 2007 00:04:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:52:12 +0100 martin rudalics <address@hidden> wrote:
>> It's the same as before: C-p skips lines 5 and 3 with rear-nonsticky
>> nil, does not skip with rear-nonsticky t, and (forward-line -1) does not
>> skip regardless of rear-nonstickiness. I tested on GNU Emacs 23.0.50.1
>> (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.12.0) of 2007-11-21. Could the
>> differences between what you and I see be related to the EOL difference
>> between MS Windows and Unix? Can other users of these systems who are
>> following this thread try these tests and report their observations?
>
> Hmmm... I think I see why you don't see it. With emacs -Q visit the
> attached file, evaluate fl-1 and the first progn, move point before
> line7 and do M-x fl-1 twice. Undo the changes, evaluate the second
> progn and do the same movement again. Can you see the difference now?
Yes. So why does (interactive) have this effect?
Steve Berman
- Re: invisible, Stephen Berman, 2007/11/09
- Re: invisible, Stephen Berman, 2007/11/17
- Re: invisible, martin rudalics, 2007/11/18
- Re: invisible, Stephen Berman, 2007/11/23
- Re: invisible, martin rudalics, 2007/11/23
- Re: invisible, Stephen Berman, 2007/11/23
- Re: invisible, martin rudalics, 2007/11/23
- Re: invisible, Stephen Berman, 2007/11/23
- Re: invisible, martin rudalics, 2007/11/23
- Re: invisible,
Stephen Berman <=
- Re: invisible, martin rudalics, 2007/11/24
- Re: invisible, Johan Bockgård, 2007/11/24
- Re: invisible, martin rudalics, 2007/11/24
- Re: invisible, martin rudalics, 2007/11/24
- Re: invisible, Stephen Berman, 2007/11/24
- Re: invisible, martin rudalics, 2007/11/24
- Re: invisible, Stefan Monnier, 2007/11/25
- Re: invisible, martin rudalics, 2007/11/26
- Re: invisible, Stefan Monnier, 2007/11/26
- Re: invisible, martin rudalics, 2007/11/26