[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
c-mask-paragraph
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
c-mask-paragraph |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:02:23 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) |
Good afternoon, Alan
In a recent attempt to violate the virginity of a comment I was told
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error "Invalid search bound (wrong side of
point)")
search-forward-regexp("\\=[ ]*\\(//+\\|\\**\\)" 19384 t)
c-mask-paragraph(nil t do-auto-fill)
c-do-auto-fill()
self-insert-command(1)
newline(nil)
#[nil "..." [soft allow-auto-fill delete-horizontal-space insert-and-inherit
10 newline 1] 2]()
c-indent-new-comment-line(nil t)
c-context-line-break()
(let ((go-back ...)) (when (and ... ...) (delete-overlay
show-paren-overlay-1)) (c-context-line-break) (when go-back (forward-line -1)
(indent-according-to-mode)))
c-newline-and-indent-maybe()
call-interactively(c-newline-and-indent-maybe)
Lack of vigour won't permit me to reproduce this soon, hence there's no
need telling me to "don't do that".
Now I surely appreciate Emacs' efforts to protect the innocence of that
poor thing. However, I'd prefer C mode to not leave it to the debugger
to tell me the truth about my evil doing. Rather, I propose to rewrite
the corresponding conjunct in `c-mask-paragraph' as
(and (> (- (cdr c-lit-limits) 2) (point))
(re-search-forward
(concat "\\=[ \t]*\\(" c-current-comment-prefix "\\)")
(- (cdr c-lit-limits) 2) t)
(not (re-search-forward
"\\(\\s \\|\\sw\\)"
(- (cdr c-lit-limits) 2) 'limit))
;; The comment ender IS on its own line. Exclude
;; this line from the filling.
(set-marker end (c-point 'bol))))
but maybe the test should _not_ fail in that case and it would be more
appropriate to use (max (- (cdr c-lit-limits) 2) (point)) as second
argument.
I'll leave it to you to work out the gory details. Thanks in advance.
martin
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- c-mask-paragraph,
martin rudalics <=