[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: invisible
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: invisible |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:59:24 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> Hmm... I didn't notice that part. But then do they also appear with
>> a line-move-ignore-invisible set to nil and a disable-point-adjustment
>> set to t? I would guess not (this case being trivial).
>>
>> If so, maybe the solution is to do as I suggested: get rid of
>> line-move-ignore-invisible and use (not disable-point-adjustment) in
>> its place.
> FWIW, the following seems to work: Disable point-adjustment in
> interactive use of `next-line' and `previous-line' and apply one of my
> earlier proposed changes.
So IIUC replacing line-move-ignore-invisible with
(not global-disable-point-adjustment) would solve the problem as well, right?
> ! (unless line-move-ignore-invisible
> ! ;; Interactively, disable point-adjustment when
> ! ;; `line-move-ignore-invisible' is nil.
> ! (setq disable-point-adjustment t))
Why not put this directly inside `line-move' so it's not duplicated?
Stefan
- Re: invisible, (continued)
- Re: invisible, Richard Stallman, 2007/11/28
- Re: invisible, martin rudalics, 2007/11/29
- Re: invisible, Stefan Monnier, 2007/11/29
- Re: invisible, martin rudalics, 2007/11/29
- Re: invisible, Stefan Monnier, 2007/11/29
- Re: invisible, martin rudalics, 2007/11/29
- Re: invisible, martin rudalics, 2007/11/30
- Re: invisible,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: invisible, martin rudalics, 2007/11/30
- Re: invisible, Stefan Monnier, 2007/11/30
- Re: invisible, martin rudalics, 2007/11/23