Re: Fixing numerous `message' bugs..

[David Kastrup]

Dave Goel <address@hidden> writes:

> Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> writes:
>
>
>> want to use EQ instead anyway, since you are comparing with a symbol.
>
> Thanks.  Attached is a new patch, which also seems much more elegant.
> I am not a C expert.  Can some one comment on it?  Shall I commit it?

Considering that the idiom

(message "%s" (or x ""))

will work instead of the proposed (message t x) and considering that it
rarely occurs (I think I should have got most cases), I don't think it
is really worth the trouble.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum