Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken

[Stefan Monnier]

> FWIW all indent-line-functions with the exception of `lisp-indent-line'
> either don't have arguments or, like `c-indent-line', `f90-indent-line',
> and `(c)perl-indent-line' expect completely different arguments here.
> Hence a generic solution seems hardly practicable.

I don't see the relation: these modes do not use indent-for-tab-command
and bind TAB to something else instead (except for perl-mode, maybe,
but we can change this one).


        Stefan