[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken |
|
Date: |
Wed, 26 Dec 2007 16:26:32 -0500 |
Does (mark) have the same meaning as (region-active-p) now?
Not the same, but (mark) looks like it is correct there.
It will return nil if no mark has been set in that buffer.
In Transient Mark mode it will signal an error if the mark
is not active, and that is ok too.
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken, (continued)
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken, Richard Stallman, 2007/12/22
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken, martin rudalics, 2007/12/22
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken, Richard Stallman, 2007/12/23
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken, martin rudalics, 2007/12/23
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken, Richard Stallman, 2007/12/24
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken, martin rudalics, 2007/12/24
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken, Richard Stallman, 2007/12/26
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken, Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2007/12/26
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken, Juri Linkov, 2007/12/27
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken, Richard Stallman, 2007/12/28
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken, Richard Stallman, 2007/12/28
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken, Stefan Monnier, 2007/12/22
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken, martin rudalics, 2007/12/23
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken, Miles Bader, 2007/12/25
- Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken, Richard Stallman, 2007/12/17