[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rfn-eshadow
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: rfn-eshadow |
|
Date: |
Sat, 05 Jan 2008 00:54:45 -0500 |
No, it is perfectly right for rfn-eshadow to treat it as a file name,
since that's what rfn-eshadow is all about: to improve file-name entry.
I think you are right. If the supposed URL is going to be interpreted
as a file name, then it is right for rfn-eshadow to treat it as a file
name too.
- Re: rfn-eshadow, (continued)
- Re: rfn-eshadow, Juri Linkov, 2008/01/04
- Re: rfn-eshadow, Michael Albinus, 2008/01/04
- Re: rfn-eshadow, Juri Linkov, 2008/01/05
- Re: rfn-eshadow, Stefan Monnier, 2008/01/05
- Re: rfn-eshadow, Michael Albinus, 2008/01/06
- Re: rfn-eshadow, Juri Linkov, 2008/01/06
- Re: rfn-eshadow, Michael Albinus, 2008/01/07
- Re: rfn-eshadow, Juri Linkov, 2008/01/08
- Re: rfn-eshadow, Stefan Monnier, 2008/01/08
- Re: rfn-eshadow, Michael Albinus, 2008/01/09
- Re: rfn-eshadow,
Richard Stallman <=