[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Automatically generated ChangeLogs (was: Selection-set editing witho
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: Automatically generated ChangeLogs (was: Selection-set editing without VC-dired) |
|
Date: |
Sat, 05 Jan 2008 14:40:43 +0200 |
> From: Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:48:09 +0100
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> Reiner Steib <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Currently our ChangeLogs contain information about the contributor
> > which is not necessarily identical to the committer. Would a recent
> > VCS hold this information in a form that an automatically regenerated
> > ChangeLog contains it too?
>
> Git distinguishes between the author and the committer. (But I don't
> think it can directly deal with multiple authors.)
We also have "(tiny change)" labels in the ChangeLog entries, which
need to be accessible when one looks up a file's history.
- Re: Selection-set editing without VC-dired, Stefan Monnier, 2008/01/01
- merging the unicode-2 branch (was: Re: Selection-set editing without VC-dired), Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/01/03
- Re: merging the unicode-2 branch (was: Re: Selection-set editing without VC-dired), Richard Stallman, 2008/01/06
- Re: merging the unicode-2 branch, Miles Bader, 2008/01/06
- Re: merging the unicode-2 branch, Nick Roberts, 2008/01/07
- Re: merging the unicode-2 branch, David Kastrup, 2008/01/07