[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Feb 2008 13:59:13 +0100 |
On Feb 4, 2008 1:50 PM, Jason Rumney <address@hidden> wrote:
> The problems on Windows have been fixed, so there is no urgency now.
And the new font backend seems significantly slower.
Juanma
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, (continued)
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/02/02
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Jason Rumney, 2008/02/02
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/02/02
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Jason Rumney, 2008/02/02
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Kenichi Handa, 2008/02/04
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Jason Rumney, 2008/02/04
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Miles Bader, 2008/02/04
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/02/05
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2008/02/06
Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Zhang Wei, 2008/02/02
Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/02/02