Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP

[Miles Bader]

"Juanma Barranquero" <address@hidden> writes:
>> The problems on Windows have been fixed, so there is no urgency now.
>
> And the new font backend seems significantly slower.

In what case?

I didn't notice any obviousy slowdown when switching to the new font
backend, even on my home machine, which is fairly slow (450 MHz P3).

-Miles

-- 
People who are more than casually interested in computers should have at
least some idea of what the underlying hardware is like.  Otherwise the
programs they write will be pretty weird.  -- Donald Knuth