[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:27:04 +0900 |
Rajesh Vaidheeswarran <address@hidden> writes:
> Miles, that's a matter of opinion, and this is your opinion. I just beg
> to differ, as do the 150-200 people who I wrote this for.
They're certainly welcome to participate in this thread. If someone has
particular needs which we aren't anticipating, it helps to know about
them.
>> and had lots of unneeded features and features which didn't follow Emacs
>> conventions. It doesn't seem necessary to me to _exactly_ preserve the
>
> No one stopped you from either filing bugs against it, or better still
> "fixing" it. That's pretty much all I have to state on this thread.
And indeed, that's what's being done now.
-Miles
--
.Numeric stability is probably not all that important when you're guessing.
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, (continued)
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Glenn Morris, 2008/02/07
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Miles Bader, 2008/02/07
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Rajesh Vaidheeswarran, 2008/02/07
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Richard Stallman, 2008/02/07
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2008/02/08
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2008/02/15
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Miles Bader, 2008/02/15
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2008/02/16
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Richard Stallman, 2008/02/17
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Rajesh Vaidheeswarran, 2008/02/19
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Rajesh Vaidheeswarran, 2008/02/19
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Richard Stallman, 2008/02/17
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2008/02/17
Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2008/02/15