[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TODO
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: TODO |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:41:20 -0500 |
If `insert-file-contents' does not change any part of the buffer, it's
basically a no-op. I see hence no reason for it to flush the undo-list
in that case.
The point is that it is somewhat unclean for the flushing to depend on
the data in the file. So the usual ways of calling `insert-file-contents'
should either flush or not, regardless of the data in the file.
- Re: TODO, (continued)
- Re: TODO, Miles Bader, 2008/02/26
- Re: TODO, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/02/26
- Re: TODO, Miles Bader, 2008/02/26
- Re: TODO, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/02/26
- Re: TODO, Miles Bader, 2008/02/26
- Re: TODO, Richard Stallman, 2008/02/27
- Re: TODO, Stefan Monnier, 2008/02/27
- Re: TODO,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: TODO [was Re: Looking for a new Emacs maintainer or team], V.Rao, 2008/02/28
- Re: TODO [was Re: Looking for a new Emacs maintainer or team], Richard Stallman, 2008/02/28
- Re: TODO [was Re: Looking for a new Emacs maintainer or team], Xavier Maillard, 2008/02/27
- Re: TODO, Michael Albinus, 2008/02/28
- Re: TODO, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/02/28
- Re: TODO, Stefan Monnier, 2008/02/28
- Re: TODO, Michael Albinus, 2008/02/28
- Re: TODO, Evans Winner, 2008/02/28
- Re: TODO, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/02/28
- Re: TODO, Michael Albinus, 2008/02/29