[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lexbind
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: lexbind |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Mar 2008 08:04:38 +0900 |
paul r writes:
> In the spirit of the (lexical-let ...), a possible improvement could
> be to have a (lexical-defun ...),
What improvement is this over
(require 'cl-macs)
(flet ((...)))
I guess it requires two less levels of parentheses, and one less level
of indentation. Anything else?
- Re: lexbind, (continued)
- Re: lexbind, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/03
- Re: lexbind, David Kastrup, 2008/03/03
- Re: lexbind, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/03
- Re: lexbind, David Kastrup, 2008/03/03
- Re: lexbind, Miles Bader, 2008/03/03
- Re: lexbind, paul r, 2008/03/03
- Re: lexbind, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/03
- Re: lexbind, paul r, 2008/03/04
- Re: lexbind, Miles Bader, 2008/03/04
- Re: lexbind, paul r, 2008/03/04
- Re: lexbind,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: lexbind, Miles Bader, 2008/03/04
- Re: lexbind, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/03/05
- Re: lexbind, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/03/05
- Re: lexbind, paul r, 2008/03/14
- Re: lexbind, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/14
- Re: lexbind, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/03/14
- Re: lexbind, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/03/03
- Re: lexbind, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/04
- Re: lexbind, Miles Bader, 2008/03/04
- Re: lexbind, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/05