[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Who uses "complete word" (aka SPC) in the minibuffer and how/why
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Who uses "complete word" (aka SPC) in the minibuffer and how/why |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:13:21 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
The subject says it all.
As I'm looking at ways to improve the default completion mechanism, I'm
trying to understand how "complete word" would fit in. In order to know
how best to adapt it to some of the situations, I'd like to know how
it's used. I personally never use it and always find TAB to be a much
better choice.
Of course, ideally nobody uses it (except some people who happen to
like to hit SPC but would be just as well served by minibuffer-complete
if it were bound to SPC) and we can get rid of it, but I expect life
isn't that simple.
Stefan
- Who uses "complete word" (aka SPC) in the minibuffer and how/why,
Stefan Monnier <=