Re: position on changing defaults?

[David Kastrup]

"Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> writes:

> David Kastrup writes:
>  > Kim Storm [it looks like] wrote:
>
>  > > But will XEmacs ignore such an interactive spec symbol?
>
> Most likely it will, since we already have the feature natively.  It
> Just Works for me (and IIRC there have been no complaints from users)
> since 2000, when it was made default.

How do you expect us to come up with an incompatible implementation
without volunteering more details?

Anyway, it would be interesting to see how you solved the problems.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum