[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs repository benchmark: bzr and git
From: |
Teemu Likonen |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs repository benchmark: bzr and git |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:19:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.5 |
Andreas Schwab kirjoitti:
> Teemu Likonen <address@hidden> writes:
> > I did some benchmarking in git and bzr repositories of Emacs. Some
> > numbers: 89711 revisions (by "git log --pretty=oneline | wc -l"),
> > 2825 files. Both repositories seem to have just linear history
> > converted from CVS repo. Both have the same head revision which is
> > 481c2a1e31f32c8aa0fb6d504575b75a18537788 (git) and
> > revid:cvs-1:tsdh-20080318180244-lxbzttdnh6ecqbka (bzr).
>
> The git repository at savannah has more revisions because it has the
> multi-tty arch history imported into it. It also contains many
> merges, although not in recent history.
Oh, I didn't notice that. Indeed, the Emacs bzr repo is 2031 commits
lighter. In theory this difference seems like a disadvantage to git in
this test. In practice it's probably not because the length of history
does not seem to have much effect on git's performance. Anyway, the
main point was bzr, and git was there just to give some perspective
(for me personally too).
Re: Emacs repository benchmark: bzr and git, Andreas Schwab, 2008/03/18
- Re: Emacs repository benchmark: bzr and git,
Teemu Likonen <=
Re: Emacs repository benchmark: bzr and git, James Westby, 2008/03/18
Re: Emacs repository benchmark: bzr and git (rerun), Teemu Likonen, 2008/03/19
Re: Emacs repository benchmark: bzr and git (rerun), Teemu Likonen, 2008/03/19
Re: Emacs Bazaar repository, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/22
Re: Emacs Bazaar repository, Christian Faulhammer, 2008/03/24