[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VC state
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: VC state |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Apr 2008 10:02:36 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
>> >> >> - there should be a way to operate on (sub)directories.
>> >>
>> >> > You mean something more than M-x vc-status DIR/SUBDIR RET ?
>> >>
>> >> Yes. There's sometimes an important difference between passing "src/"
>> >> as the argument vs passing all the files in "src/" that appear in the
>> >> vc-status (beside the fact that the former does not require you to
>> >> first mark each one of those files).
>>
>> > Many VC commands choke when given a directory parameter, so this does
>> > not seem particularly useful at this time.
>>
>> > More, given that vc-status is still "experimental code", and there is no
>> > clear path/criteria on getting it out of that state, I am not inclined
>> > to put more effort in adding more features to it.
>>
>> I don't see it as particularly experimental: it's what I now use as
>> a replacement for PCL-CVS when I use Bzr.
> So can the experimental label be removed then?
Yes.
> How about binding vc-status to C-x v d so that it gets more exposure?
> What is the plan for vc-dired?
I'd suggest we leave vc-dired alone for now. You can remove vc-dired
from the menu bar, tho, and replace it by an entry for vc-status.
You may want to put it more preeminently at the beginning of
the submenu.
As for a key binding, I don't find C-x v d particularly good anyway, so
we may as well choose a better one.
You may also want to add a vc-dired-noselect (which calls vc-status) to
find-directory-functions, like PCL-CVS does (it's what I always use to
invoke PCL-CVS).
> When can it be removed?
Just pretend it's not there.
Stefan
- Re: VC state, (continued)
- Re: VC state, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/04/08
- Re: VC state, Stefan Monnier, 2008/04/08
- Re: VC state, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/04/08
- Re: VC state, Nick Roberts, 2008/04/08
- Re: VC state, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/04/09
- VC development [was Re: VC state], Nick Roberts, 2008/04/10
- Re: VC state, Nick Roberts, 2008/04/10
- Re: VC state, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/04/10
- Re: VC state, Nick Roberts, 2008/04/11
- Re: VC state, Stefan Monnier, 2008/04/10
- Re: VC state,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: VC state, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/04/10