Re: [PATCH] support filename prefixes and 100-character filenames in tar-mode.el

[David Glasser]

On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Juri Linkov <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> > With all of the patch except for the change in the initial
>  >>  > initialization of name-end, the results look correct, except the
>  >>  > penultimate line ends in "foo2" instead of "foo20"; that is because
>  >>  > the name field here fill the entire field with no nulls, but the code
>  >>  > previously assumed there would be at least one null.  (It's possible
>  >>  > that similar adjustments are required for the initial values of
>  >>  > link-end, gname-end, and uname-end.)
>  >>
>  >>  Does your patch also handle @LongLink currently unsupported by 
> tar-mode.el?
>  >
>  > Is it actually unsupported?  When I tried to make a tarball to test
>  > this issue with GNU tar, I saw stuff about "@LongLink" when I opened
>  > it in tar-mode.  (Try making a tarball from the one I sent using GNU
>  > tar; you'll see what I mean; I made my test tarball with pax, since
>  > that was what was used to make the one I opened when I first noticed
>  > this issue.)  I don't know if it was correct or not, though.
>
>  Please see a test tarball attached below.  It is correctly created with
>  GNU tar, but opening it in Emacs displays the following message:
>
>     Warning: premature EOF parsing tar file
>
>  Also its file listing is incomplete, file names are truncated, and content
>  of some files is inserted into the file listing in the tar-mode buffer.
>
>  I thought your patch will fix these problems.

Ugh, that's pretty gross.  Mine fixes issues with a different way of
encoding long file names, as far as I understand.  However, there is
*some* long-link support in tar-mode.el, just not whatever's up with
that file.

--dave


-- 
David Glasser | address@hidden | http://www.davidglasser.net/