Re: utf-16le vs utf-16-le

[Stephen J. Turnbull]

Jan Djärv writes:

 > In recode they have "surfaces".  So charset is separate from surfaces, for 
 > example EOL convention.  That would be nice to have in Emacs as well.

Do you know how recode's terminology maps to Unicode TR #17?  (If you
don't know what I'm talking about, please disregard; I just never
figured out what "surfaces" were and wouldn't mind a free clue.)