Re: yank-secondary

[Stefan Monnier]

>> >> Why not just either yank and swap primary<->secondary?
[...]

> With such a swap, the cursor would always move to the end (or
> beginning) of the secondary selection. That movement is precisely why
> I said that (my) `secondary-to-primary' is much less useful than (my)
> `primary-to-secondary': it's not too often that you want to move to
> where the secondary selection is.  (And when you do, I can't imagine
> why you would at the same time want to make the previous region the
> new secondary.)

I see, thanks,


        Stefan