[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: vc-revert-hook?
From: |
Dan Nicolaescu |
Subject: |
Re: vc-revert-hook? |
Date: |
Wed, 07 May 2008 11:29:47 -0700 |
"Marshall, Simon" <address@hidden> writes:
> Some time ago, vc.el used to have a vc-revert-hook. I used it to cause a
Can you point out the version, or the exact name of the hook, a search
vc-revert-hook comes out empty...
> subsequent recompilation - of a modified source file that I had then
reverted
> via C-x v u (AKA M-x vc-revert-buffer) - by touching the source file:
>
> (add-hook 'vc-revert-hook
> (lambda ()
> (shell-command (concat "touch " buffer-file-name))))
>
> Without this, CVS (my backend VCS) or vc.el would leave the reverted source
> file with the timestamp of the reverted revision, ie, older than the
modified
> file, and a dependency-based recompilation would be fooled into thinking
that
> the source file's compiled object file was up-to-date.
Are you sure? A quick experiment showed that and after C-x v u the file
on disk had the time stamp set to the current time...
Can you replicate the problem with emacs -Q?
- vc-revert-hook?, Marshall, Simon, 2008/05/07
- Re: vc-revert-hook?,
Dan Nicolaescu <=
- RE: vc-revert-hook?, Marshall, Simon, 2008/05/08
- Re: vc-revert-hook?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/05/08
- RE: vc-revert-hook?, Marshall, Simon, 2008/05/08
- Re: vc-revert-hook?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/05/08
- RE: vc-revert-hook?, Marshall, Simon, 2008/05/12
- Re: vc-revert-hook?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/05/12
- RE: vc-revert-hook?, Marshall, Simon, 2008/05/12
- Re: vc-revert-hook?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/05/12
- RE: vc-revert-hook?, Marshall, Simon, 2008/05/13
- Re: vc-revert-hook?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/05/13