Re: [PATCH] Re: ftfont ISO10646-1 font bug found (was Re: 23.0.60; Heavy display problems with new font backend)

[Kenichi Handa]

In article <address@hidden>, address@hidden writes:

> Kenichi Handa writes:
> > I think it's very ad-hoc to return only such fonts that has
> > that specific character in that case.  Many non-English
> > fonts doesn't support it.

> Please take a look at my recent mail with the subject "Accumulated
> fontset definition tweaks for testing".  I have come up with fixes for
> all my display problems in the Emacs Lisp libraries.  The email lists
> the various problems I found in "fontset.el".

I'm now reading it, and will respond soon.

> > First of all, I have not that much considered about using
> > PCF fonts via ftfont driver because it can be used by xfont
> > driver if you put them in X's font-path.  On the contrary, I
> > was even thinking about rejecting all PCF fonts in xft
> > backend.

> Does the xfont driver continue to work if a person specifies "xft" as
> the font backend?

No if one specifies ONLY xft backend.  But, why does he do
that if he also wants PCF fonts?

---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden