[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8 |
Date: |
Thu, 22 May 2008 13:33:21 +0900 |
address@hidden writes:
>> > | [...] XML processors MUST be able to use this character to
>> > | differentiate between UTF-8 and UTF-16 encoded documents.
>> > `----
>
> ...and how are the XML processors supposed to achieve that? Is there a
> second variant of BOM, indicating UTF-8?
The encoding of BOM (incidentally, isn't this name for it obsolete?) is
different in utf-8 and utf-16.
-Miles
--
Quotation, n. The act of repeating erroneously the words of another. The words
erroneously repeated.
- 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Patrick Drechsler, 2008/05/17
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/05/17
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Mark A. Hershberger, 2008/05/17
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, tomas, 2008/05/22
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Jason Rumney, 2008/05/22
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, tomas, 2008/05/27
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/05/22
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, tomas, 2008/05/23
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/05/23
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, tomas, 2008/05/27
23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/05/17