[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8 |
Date: |
Thu, 22 May 2008 08:43:34 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> "Mark" == Mark A Hershberger <address@hidden> writes:
Mark> However, you'll note that the spec still does not leave room for a BOM.
Mark> I don't know enough about UTF-8 encoding and XML to know if this
Mark> matters.
Note that this is an issue not just for XML files. I recently added
some code to libcpp to ignore UTF-8 BOMs -- because some Windows
editors add them by default and because, supposedly, Visual Studio
requires them.
So, I think it would be nice for interoperability to handle them
properly, the same way Emacs handles different kinds of line endings.
Tom
- 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Patrick Drechsler, 2008/05/17
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/05/17
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Mark A. Hershberger, 2008/05/17
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, tomas, 2008/05/22
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Miles Bader, 2008/05/22
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Jason Rumney, 2008/05/22
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, tomas, 2008/05/27
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/05/22
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, tomas, 2008/05/23
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/05/23
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, tomas, 2008/05/27
23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/05/17