|
From: | Jason Rumney |
Subject: | Re: 23.0.60; wrong glyph widths of some Unicode codepoints |
Date: | Fri, 23 May 2008 13:51:24 +0100 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) |
Kenichi Handa wrote:
Ah! But, then why does fontconfig put higher priority to bistream fonts?
My best guess would be because they have good enough coverage for most US/European users, and less memory is used due to the narrower coverage. Either that or the GNU/Linux distributors are just being conservative with their default configurations and prefering the older original font rather than its still under development offshoot.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |