[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: proced.el [was: docstrings in dired.el]
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: proced.el [was: docstrings in dired.el] |
Date: |
Sat, 24 May 2008 19:12:22 +0300 |
> Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 02:51:34 +0200
> From: "Roland Winkler" <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> On Fri May 23 2008 Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Well, maybe at least consider refactoring the current Lisp code so
> > that the code which relies on `ps' is limited to a few functions with
> > well-defined interfaces. Then someone else could reimplement them in
> > a portable fashion.
>
> That's what I try anyway.
That's good to hear. I hope, as part of that, you are planning on
refactoring the usage of proced-command-alist and
proced-sorting-schemes-alist to hide the dependency on `ps's options
behind some more general API.
- docstrings in dired.el, Roland Winkler, 2008/05/23
- Re: proced.el [was: docstrings in dired.el], Richard M Stallman, 2008/05/24
- Re: proced.el [was: docstrings in dired.el], Eli Zaretskii, 2008/05/24
- Re: proced.el, Stefan Monnier, 2008/05/24
- Re: proced.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/05/24
- Re: proced.el, Stefan Monnier, 2008/05/24
Re: docstrings in dired.el, Richard M Stallman, 2008/05/23