Re: proced.el [was: docstrings in dired.el]

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 02:51:34 +0200
> From: "Roland Winkler" <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> 
> On Fri May 23 2008 Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Well, maybe at least consider refactoring the current Lisp code so
> > that the code which relies on `ps' is limited to a few functions with
> > well-defined interfaces.  Then someone else could reimplement them in
> > a portable fashion.
> 
> That's what I try anyway.

That's good to hear.  I hope, as part of that, you are planning on
refactoring the usage of proced-command-alist and
proced-sorting-schemes-alist to hide the dependency on `ps's options
behind some more general API.