[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: proced.el
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: proced.el |
Date: |
Sat, 24 May 2008 15:34:26 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
>> Obviously I can't decide what you work on, but let's not forget that we
>> lived happily without proced at all (not even some simpler replacement),
>> so I think there are more important things on which to work. How 'bout
>> fixing some of the bugs at http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/emacs ?
> You are confused: it's Roland who works on proced.el, not me.
I was referring to your "Now I have a challenge in hand to prove that
you are wrong", which seemed to imply that you intended to come up with
the C-level code to prove Richard wrong.
> Or are you saying that everybody else can work on new development, but
> I should work on fixing bugs?
;-)
Stefan
- Re: proced.el [was: docstrings in dired.el], (continued)
- Re: proced.el [was: docstrings in dired.el], Roland Winkler, 2008/05/23
- Re: proced.el [was: docstrings in dired.el], Eli Zaretskii, 2008/05/23
- Re: proced.el [was: docstrings in dired.el], Roland Winkler, 2008/05/23
- Re: proced.el [was: docstrings in dired.el], Eli Zaretskii, 2008/05/24
- Re: proced.el [was: docstrings in dired.el], Roland Winkler, 2008/05/24
- Re: proced.el [was: docstrings in dired.el], Eli Zaretskii, 2008/05/24
- Re: proced.el [was: docstrings in dired.el], Richard M Stallman, 2008/05/24
- Re: proced.el [was: docstrings in dired.el], Eli Zaretskii, 2008/05/24
- Re: proced.el, Stefan Monnier, 2008/05/24
- Re: proced.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/05/24
- Re: proced.el,
Stefan Monnier <=
Re: docstrings in dired.el, Richard M Stallman, 2008/05/23