[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Memory leak
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: Memory leak |
Date: |
Sun, 25 May 2008 11:02:35 +1200 |
I'm joining the thread a bit late but anyway:
Instead of Valgrind, which has been shown to be unsuitable several times, how
about using Coverity to identify the source of the memory leak(s)?
Ben Chelf the CTO for Coverity said "we have set up a framework internally to
continually scan open source projects" and I have the impression that they
scan the most recent Emacs source, or at least can.
Is anyone still signed up to access their reports? If not, is it worth
approaching them again?
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
- Re: Memory leak, (continued)
- Re: Memory leak, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/05/18
- Re: Memory leak, Jan Djärv, 2008/05/20
- Re: Memory leak, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/05/18
- Re: Memory leak, Jan Djärv, 2008/05/20
- Re: Memory leak, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/05/21
- Re: Memory leak, Stefan Monnier, 2008/05/21
Re: Memory leak, Evil Boris, 2008/05/23
Re: Memory leak,
Nick Roberts <=
memory leak, Drew Adams, 2008/05/30