[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-M-TAB stand-in for M-TAB, on MS Windows?
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: C-M-TAB stand-in for M-TAB, on MS Windows? |
Date: |
Mon, 26 May 2008 10:18:45 +0900 |
Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
>> C-M-tab is undefined by default, and many (most? nearly all?) users on
>> Windows
>> will use Emacs with the window manager, so this key is available to them.
>> What
>> about, on Windows, binding C-M-tab to whatever M-TAB is bound to?
>
> Seems like a decent idea to me... Why not do it on all systems?
>
> [Besides the benefit of consistency, it would help with other WMs (e.g.,
> gnome's) which copy the windows behavior and steal M-TAB from apps.]
Though I notice that gnome _also_ seems to steal C-M-TAB!
-Miles
--
You can hack anything you want, with TECO and DDT.
- C-M-TAB stand-in for M-TAB, on MS Windows?, Drew Adams, 2008/05/25
- Re: C-M-TAB stand-in for M-TAB, on MS Windows?, Miles Bader, 2008/05/25
- Re: C-M-TAB stand-in for M-TAB, on MS Windows?,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: C-M-TAB stand-in for M-TAB, on MS Windows?, Miles Bader, 2008/05/25
- Re: C-M-TAB stand-in for M-TAB, on MS Windows?, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/05/26
- Re: C-M-TAB stand-in for M-TAB, on MS Windows?, Miles Bader, 2008/05/26
- RE: C-M-TAB stand-in for M-TAB, on MS Windows?, Drew Adams, 2008/05/26
- Re: C-M-TAB stand-in for M-TAB, on MS Windows?, Miles Bader, 2008/05/26
- RE: C-M-TAB stand-in for M-TAB, on MS Windows?, Drew Adams, 2008/05/26
- Re: C-M-TAB stand-in for M-TAB, on MS Windows?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/05/26
- Re: C-M-TAB stand-in for M-TAB, on MS Windows?, Jason Rumney, 2008/05/26
- Re: C-M-TAB stand-in for M-TAB, on MS Windows?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/05/26
- Re: C-M-TAB stand-in for M-TAB, on MS Windows?, Jason Rumney, 2008/05/26