[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: pretest, devel and bug lists
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: pretest, devel and bug lists |
Date: |
Tue, 27 May 2008 13:33:15 -0700 |
> If things sent to emacs-pretest-bug are being fed into a bug tracker
> and sent to bug-gnu-emacs, then I would say there is no need for
> copies to _also_ be sent to emacs-devel.
I agree. Bug tracking and bugs discussions should be in a separate mailing list
from emacs-devel. If a particular bug thread develops into a development
discussion, it can be moved to emacs-devel. (Yes, I know that pretest bugs can
often involve development discussions.)
> I also don't see the need for tracker control messages to be sent to
> bug-gnu-emacs, but I'm less sure about that.
I think I disagree. I like everything about Emacs bugs to be sent to the bugs
list. But I too am less sure about this.
- pretest, devel and bug lists, Glenn Morris, 2008/05/27
- RE: pretest, devel and bug lists,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: pretest, devel and bug lists, Jason Rumney, 2008/05/27
- Re: pretest, devel and bug lists, Richard M Stallman, 2008/05/28
- Re: pretest, devel and bug lists, Stefan Monnier, 2008/05/28
- Re: pretest, devel and bug lists, Sven Joachim, 2008/05/28
- Re: pretest, devel and bug lists, Stefan Monnier, 2008/05/28
- Re: pretest, devel and bug lists, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/05/28
- Re: pretest, devel and bug lists, Don Armstrong, 2008/05/28
- Re: pretest, devel and bug lists, Nick Roberts, 2008/05/28
- Re: pretest, devel and bug lists, Don Armstrong, 2008/05/28
- Re: pretest, devel and bug lists, Richard M Stallman, 2008/05/29