[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 67, Issue 11
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 67, Issue 11 |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:02:49 +0900 |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
In article <address@hidden>, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> > From: Kenichi Handa <address@hidden>
> > CC: address@hidden
> > Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 09:40:45 +0900
> >
> > The target leim-list.el depends on leim-ext.el, and we do
> > this at the end:
> >
> > sed -n '/^[^;]/ p' < ${srcdir}/leim-ext.el >> $@
> >
> > So, when you modify leim-ext.el, leim-list.el is re-build,
> > but, if we don't remove leim-list.el at first, the contents
> > of leim-ext.el are duplicated.
> >
> > In addition, update-leim-list-file works a little bit faster
> > when leim-list.el is vacant.
> >
> > Do you actually find any problem with this change?
> No, I just wondered why something that was unchanged for so long is
> being changed now. I guess you are saying that appending leim-ext.el
> to the existing leim-list.el was a mistake because it duplicated the
> same stuff time and again?
I don't think appending leim-ext.el itself is not a mistake.
The mistake was not to start creating leim-list.el from scratch.
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden