Re: Adding parameters to windows

[David Kastrup]

address@hidden writes:

> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> M-x checkdoc RET
>>
>> should help with getting stuff more coding convention compliant.
>
> Thanks. This was a patch at the C level. Can checkdoc be coerced to
> handle Emacs C code?

Not that I know of.  Sorry for the noise.  Maybe one could convert into
a pseudo-Lisp buffer and check that, but it is not really the same
thing, I guess.

It would likely help if one used overlays with modification-hooks on the
corresponding passages from Lisp and C that transferred changes in one
buffer over to the other.  That could be useful for some other
applications as well.  But the difference between C and Lisp strings is
not going to make things easier.

-- 
David Kastrup