[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Preprocessor defines in MS-Windows build
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Preprocessor defines in MS-Windows build |
Date: |
Sat, 07 Jun 2008 23:09:58 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
>> Ideally src/config.h, no (tho maybe it's more difficult)?
> You mean, nt/config.nt (that is copied into src/config.h), right?
I guess so.
> Why is that better, btw?
I just assume that the closer it is to the way other builds work
(i.e. autoconf in this case) the better.
>> > HAVE_NTGUI -- can be replaced with WINDOWSNT, since the W32
>> > build doesn't use any other GUI
>> Don't we support W32 builds without GUI?
> No, not AFAIK. The produced binary can be run with the -nw switch,
> but it has GUI support built in.
I see. But keeping a separate HAVE_NTGUI still makes sense in case we
want to allow non-GUI builds (or in case we ever want to provide an X11
version of the W32 build). It's not important to keep the distinction,
but I don't see much benefit in getting rid of rid.
>> > Does someone know anything that contradicts the above? If not, I
>> > think we should remove those defines that are not needed anymore, and
>> > put those which are needed in ms-w32.h.
>> Sounds fine to me,
> Thanks for the feedback.
My pleasure,
Stefan
Re: Preprocessor defines in MS-Windows build, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/06/26