[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Copyright question
|
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
|
Subject: |
Re: Copyright question |
|
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:13:36 -0400 |
> You could satisfy Debian's requirements simply by making the
> manual available under the GPL in addition to the GFDL. No need
> to stop distributing it under the GFDL.
Yes, dual licencing looks like to be the easiest solution.
Why is this not the one chosen for Emacs manual as well?
The GPL, being a free software license, lacks important provisions for
free documentation; which is what the GFDL provides.
- Re: Copyright question, (continued)
- Re: Copyright question, Glenn Morris, 2008/06/12
- Re: Copyright question, Andreas Röhler, 2008/06/13
- Re: Copyright question, Alan Mackenzie, 2008/06/13
- Re: Copyright question, Miles Bader, 2008/06/13
- Re: Copyright question, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/13
- Re: Copyright question, Andreas Röhler, 2008/06/13
- Re: Copyright question, David Kastrup, 2008/06/13
- Re: Copyright question, David Kastrup, 2008/06/12
Re: Copyright question, Don Armstrong, 2008/06/12
Re: Copyright question, Richard M Stallman, 2008/06/13
- Re: Copyright question, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/06/13
- Re: Copyright question, Alan Mackenzie, 2008/06/13
- Re: Copyright question, Richard M Stallman, 2008/06/13
- Re: Copyright question, Alan Mackenzie, 2008/06/14
- Re: Copyright question, Glenn Morris, 2008/06/14
- Re: Copyright question, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/06/14
- Re: Copyright question, David Kastrup, 2008/06/14
Re: Copyright question, David Kastrup, 2008/06/13