[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Copyright question
From: |
Andreas Röhler |
Subject: |
Re: Copyright question |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:55:14 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012) |
Am Freitag, 13. Juni 2008 schrieb Glenn Morris:
> "İsmail Dönmez" wrote:
>
> > Of course he can relicense it
>
> This was not as obvious to me as it was to others, since we assign our
> past and future rights to the FSF. But looking at the details, they
> grant rights back to the original author, so if there is a "pristine"
> version of org.texi that is solely your own work, you can probably do
> what you like with it.
>
>
>
What means "pristine"? New from the scratch?
Copyright-assigment policy will lead to burocracy. It will discourage people
and stiffle their creativity. And probably it will shadow reputation of FSF,
which is to deplore not only for Emacs's sake.
I miss the human maintainer and copyright-notice in the sources. It was always
nice to read. Maintainer FSF reads terrible.
Greetings
Andreas Roehler
- Re: Copyright question, (continued)
- Re: Copyright question, David Kastrup, 2008/06/13
- Re: Copyright question, Richard M Stallman, 2008/06/13
- Re: Copyright question, Carsten Dominik, 2008/06/14
- Re: Copyright question, Don Armstrong, 2008/06/14
- Re: Copyright question, Richard M Stallman, 2008/06/15
Re: Copyright question, David Hansen, 2008/06/12
Re: Copyright question, Glenn Morris, 2008/06/12
- Re: Copyright question, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/06/12
- Re: Copyright question, İsmail Dönmez, 2008/06/12
- Re: Copyright question, Glenn Morris, 2008/06/12
- Re: Copyright question,
Andreas Röhler <=
- Re: Copyright question, Alan Mackenzie, 2008/06/13
- Re: Copyright question, Miles Bader, 2008/06/13
- Re: Copyright question, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/13
- Re: Copyright question, Andreas Röhler, 2008/06/13
- Re: Copyright question, David Kastrup, 2008/06/13
Re: Copyright question, David Kastrup, 2008/06/12
Re: Copyright question, Don Armstrong, 2008/06/12
Re: Copyright question, Richard M Stallman, 2008/06/13