[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Copyright question
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Copyright question |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:00:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
Andreas Röhler <address@hidden> writes:
> let aside some stipulations in the assigment itself: In
> case of GPL violations FSF could pay the lawyer and
> take over the legal fees (as getting
> your right from courts and have it are fairly
> different kind of things in this world :)).
They are a tax-exempted charity. They can't just pay some lawyer and
fees nilly-willy, in particularly not when the copyright holder for whom
they are paying is not even in the United States.
Anyway, this particular argument/sentiment is not related to Emacs at
all and thus off-topic here.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Copyright question, (continued)
- Re: Copyright question, David Hansen, 2008/06/12
- Re: Copyright question, Glenn Morris, 2008/06/12
- Re: Copyright question, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/06/12
- Re: Copyright question, İsmail Dönmez, 2008/06/12
- Re: Copyright question, Glenn Morris, 2008/06/12
- Re: Copyright question, Andreas Röhler, 2008/06/13
- Re: Copyright question, Alan Mackenzie, 2008/06/13
- Re: Copyright question, Miles Bader, 2008/06/13
- Re: Copyright question, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/13
- Re: Copyright question, Andreas Röhler, 2008/06/13
- Re: Copyright question,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Copyright question, David Kastrup, 2008/06/12
Re: Copyright question, Don Armstrong, 2008/06/12
Re: Copyright question, Richard M Stallman, 2008/06/13