[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lost antialias?
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: Lost antialias? |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:36:37 +0900 |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
In article <address@hidden>, Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
> Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
>>> Is there any reason to have x,xft by default, instead of xft,x?
> >
> > Backward compatibility.
> Is this really very important?
> I suspect many (maybe most) people will _want_ the "incompatible" font
> when there's a conflict.
Until the code gets more stable, I'd like to keep backward
compatibility where it's easy to do that.
And, at least, I think Xft backend is slower when you runs
Emacs remotely via narrow network.
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- Lost antialias?, Angelo Graziosi, 2008/06/13
- Re: Lost antialias?, Kenichi Handa, 2008/06/13
- Re: Lost antialias?, Angelo Graziosi, 2008/06/13
- Re: Lost antialias?, Angelo Graziosi, 2008/06/14
- Re: Lost antialias?, Kenichi Handa, 2008/06/15
- Re: Lost antialias?, Chong Yidong, 2008/06/15
- Re: Lost antialias?, Kenichi Handa, 2008/06/16
- Re: Lost antialias?, Miles Bader, 2008/06/16
- Re: Lost antialias?,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: Lost antialias?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/16
- Re: Lost antialias?, Kenichi Handa, 2008/06/16
- Re: Lost antialias?, Chong Yidong, 2008/06/17
- Re: Lost antialias?, Miles Bader, 2008/06/17
- Re: Lost antialias?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/17
- Re: Lost antialias?, Angelo Graziosi, 2008/06/17
- Re: Lost antialias?, Chong Yidong, 2008/06/20
- Re: Lost antialias?, Miles Bader, 2008/06/20
- Re: Lost antialias?, Chong Yidong, 2008/06/20
- Re: Lost antialias?, Miles Bader, 2008/06/20