[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lost antialias?
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: Lost antialias? |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:46:33 +0900 |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
In article <address@hidden>, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>> Is there any reason to have x,xft by default, instead of xft,x?
>>> > Backward compatibility.
>>> Is this really very important?
>>> I suspect many (maybe most) people will _want_ the "incompatible" font
>>> when there's a conflict.
> > Until the code gets more stable, I'd like to keep backward
> > compatibility where it's easy to do that.
> What's the recommended way to change this option in .emacs?
(push '(font-backend xft x) default-frame-alist)
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- Re: Lost antialias?, (continued)
- Re: Lost antialias?, Angelo Graziosi, 2008/06/13
- Re: Lost antialias?, Angelo Graziosi, 2008/06/14
- Re: Lost antialias?, Kenichi Handa, 2008/06/15
- Re: Lost antialias?, Chong Yidong, 2008/06/15
- Re: Lost antialias?, Kenichi Handa, 2008/06/16
- Re: Lost antialias?, Miles Bader, 2008/06/16
- Re: Lost antialias?, Kenichi Handa, 2008/06/16
- Re: Lost antialias?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/16
- Re: Lost antialias?,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: Lost antialias?, Chong Yidong, 2008/06/17
- Re: Lost antialias?, Miles Bader, 2008/06/17
- Re: Lost antialias?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/17
- Re: Lost antialias?, Angelo Graziosi, 2008/06/17
- Re: Lost antialias?, Chong Yidong, 2008/06/20
- Re: Lost antialias?, Miles Bader, 2008/06/20
- Re: Lost antialias?, Chong Yidong, 2008/06/20
- Re: Lost antialias?, Miles Bader, 2008/06/20
- Re: Lost antialias?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/20
- Re: Lost antialias?, Miles Bader, 2008/06/20