Re: movement bindings in c-mode

[Lennart Borgman (gmail)]

David Hansen wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:05:53 +0000 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>
> > Just one small point, though.  The doc-string for
> > beginning-of-defun-function recommends putting point at the { rather
> > than the function header.  I think this is unright.  Stefan?
>
> Actually I would prefer to have it in front of the `{'.  If you just
> want to read something around the b-o-d it doesn't matter.


Does narrow-to-defun use beginning-of-defun-function?