[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why `lisp' and `shortlisp'
|
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
|
Subject: |
Re: Why `lisp' and `shortlisp' |
|
Date: |
Thu, 03 Jul 2008 21:13:23 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
>>> $lisp specifies the full path for those who build in a different directory.
> [...]
>> But if `shortlisp' works, why use `lisp'?
> See line 1 for my guess. I haven't investigated.
That would mean that `shortlisp' doesn't work.
So if `shortlisp' always works, why use `lisp'? and if `shortlisp'
doesn't always work, isn't it a bug to use it?
Stefan